dc.contributor.author |
Waters, Donald |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-06-21T16:34:01Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-06-21T16:34:01Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/5856 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
"The Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information argued that the value of digital information rests in what it contributes to our cultural memory. Because cultural memory is a public good, it follows that insuring against the possible loss of such memory by the archiving of digital information would also be a public good. The joint economic interest of publishers, authors, and the scholarly community in electronic journals as intellectual property is reason to suggest that archiving them may not be a public good in the strictest sense of the term. Still, the archiving of digital information has special properties as a kind of modified public good that demands special attention." |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
en_US |
dc.subject |
information commons |
en_US |
dc.subject |
preservation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
public goods and bads |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Internet |
en_US |
dc.title |
Good Archives Make Good Scholars: Reflections on Recent Steps Toward the Archiving of Digital Information |
en_US |
dc.type |
Working Paper |
en_US |
dc.type.methodology |
Commentory |
en_US |
dc.publisher.workingpaperseries |
Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR), Washington, DC |
en_US |
dc.subject.sector |
Information & Knowledge |
en_US |