| dc.contributor.author |
Singer, S. Fred |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Christy, John R. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Davis, Robert E. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Legates, David R. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
Novicoff, Wendy M. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-08-23T19:29:05Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-08-23T19:29:05Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2003 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/6155 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
"As public debate examines new developments in the ongoing debate about past climate change, it is important to recognize that there have been a number of additional advances in climate science, many of which were concurrent or after the publication of the most recent (2001) Assessment of Climate Change by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the 2000 National Assessment of U.S. Climate Change. This latter document was used extensively by the U.S. Environmental Protection agency in its 2001 Climate Action Report.
As shown in The Independent Institute’s new report, New Perspectives in Climate Change: What the EPA Isn’t Telling Us, critical portions of science in all of these reports are misleading, inaccurate, unreliable, or simply wrong. However, that is not an indictment of the individuals involved, but is rather more symptomatic of the nature of science when funded by government agencies with a possible stake in the findings." |
en_US |
| dc.language |
English |
en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Independent Policy Report |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
climate change |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Environmental Protection Agency |
en_US |
| dc.title |
New Perspectives in Climate Science: What the EPA Isnt Telling Us |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Working Paper |
en_US |
| dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
| dc.publisher.workingpaperseries |
The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.region |
North America |
en_US |
| dc.coverage.country |
United States |
en_US |
| dc.subject.sector |
General & Multiple Resources |
en_US |