hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Comparison of the Different Land Use on the Emission of Greenhouse Gases

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mahdipuor
dc.contributor.author Landi
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-05T21:11:53Z
dc.date.available 2011-01-05T21:11:53Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/6679
dc.description.abstract "An increase in the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) from the soil surface to the atmosphere has been of worldwide concern over the last several decades. Carbon dioxide is recognized as a significant contributor to global warming and climatic change, accounting for 60% of total greenhouse effect. The aim of this research was to determinate the emission of greenhouse gases from different land under agricultural uses. Four types of agricultural land farm, including wheat field, canola field, citrus garden and fallow land were selected to investigate the fate of CO2 in these fields. Gas chromatography technique and close chamber method were used to analyze soil gas samples. Total carbon losses from soil in form of greenhouse gases was 4.47, 3.72, 3.38 and 1.89 Mg C ha-1 yr-1 for wheat field, canola field, citrus garden and fallow land, respectively. Total additional carbon to soil from biomass for wheat field and canola field was 4.1 and 4.6 Mg C ha-1 yr-1, respectively. ECB (ecosystem carbon budget) = ∑ C input - ∑ C output. For wheat field and canola field ECB was -0.37 and +0.88, respectively. This indicated that in wheat field carbon was lost and in canola field carbon was sequestrated. Under citrus garden due to changes in soil organic carbon form previous year has showed that carbon was sequestrated." en_US
dc.language other en_US
dc.subject global warming en_US
dc.subject climate change en_US
dc.subject agriculture en_US
dc.subject land tenure and use en_US
dc.title Comparison of the Different Land Use on the Emission of Greenhouse Gases en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.subject.sector Global Commons en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 14 en_US
dc.identifier.citationpages 139-148 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
comparison.pdf 271.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record