dc.contributor.author |
Badola, Ruchi |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-09-26T19:45:53Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-09-26T19:45:53Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1999 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10535/8397 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
"The basic approach to management of PAs has been isolationist, based on the questionable assumption that certain areas are pristine or primary and that management must protect the park from people living in surrounding areas and shield wildlife and other natural resources from exploitation. This is achieved through the strict enforcement of legislation, patrols to prevent illegal activities and infrastructure maintenance. In this scenario, attempts to protect PAs from human intervention by coercion have often led to hostile attitudes of local people towards wildlife management and forestry staff, and sometimes to open conflict." |
en_US |
dc.language |
English |
en_US |
dc.subject |
forest management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
protected areas |
en_US |
dc.subject |
biodiversity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
participatory management |
en_US |
dc.subject |
economic development |
en_US |
dc.title |
People and Protected Areas in India |
en_US |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_US |
dc.type.published |
published |
en_US |
dc.type.methodology |
Case Study |
en_US |
dc.coverage.region |
Middle East & South Asia |
en_US |
dc.coverage.country |
India |
en_US |
dc.subject.sector |
Forestry |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationjournal |
Unasylva |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationvolume |
50 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationpages |
12-14 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.citationnumber |
199 |
en_US |