hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Trust and Intention to Comply with a Water Allocation Decision: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge and Consistency

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hamm, Joseph A.
dc.contributor.author PytlikZillig, Lisa M.
dc.contributor.author Herian, Mitchel N.
dc.contributor.author Tomkins, Alan J.
dc.contributor.author Dietrich, Hannah
dc.contributor.author Michaels, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-23T20:47:42Z
dc.date.available 2014-01-23T20:47:42Z
dc.date.issued 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/9210
dc.description.abstract "Regulating water resources is a critically important yet increasingly complex component of the interaction between ecology and society. Many argue that effective water regulation relies heavily upon the compliance of water users. The relevant literature suggests that, rather than relying on external motivators for individual compliance, e.g., punishments and rewards, it is preferable to focus on internal motivators, including trust in others. Although prior scholarship has resulted in contemporary institutional efforts to increase public trust, these efforts are hindered by a lack of evidence regarding the specific situations in which trust, in its various forms, most effectively increases compliance. We report the results of an experiment designed to compare the impacts of three trust-related constructs, a broad sense of trust in the institution, specific process-fairness perceptions, and a dispositional tendency to trust others, on compliance with water regulation under experimentally varied situations. Specifically, we tested the potential moderating influences of concepts relevant to water regulation in the real world: high versus low information conditions about an institutional decision, decision consistency with relevant data, and decision outcome valence. Our results suggest that participants’ dispositional trust predicts their intent to comply when they have limited information about decisions, but the effects of dispositional trust are mediated by trust in the institution. Institutional trust predicts compliance under narrow conditions: when information is lacking or when decision outcomes are positive and are justified by available data. Finally, when the regulatory decision is inconsistent with other data in high-information conditions, prior judgments of institutional process fairness are most predictive of intent to comply. Our results may give guidance to water regulators, who may want to try to increase trust and thus increase voluntary compliance; the results suggest, in particular, that such efforts be tailored to the situation." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject compliance en_US
dc.subject trust en_US
dc.subject natural resources en_US
dc.subject water management en_US
dc.subject allocation rules en_US
dc.title Trust and Intention to Comply with a Water Allocation Decision: The Moderating Roles of Knowledge and Consistency en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Case Study en_US
dc.subject.sector Water Resource & Irrigation en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 18 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 4 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth December en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2013-5849.pdf 375.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record