hidden
Image Database Export Citations

Menu:

Does Size Matter? An Assessment of Quota Market Evolution and Performance ni the Great Barrier Reef Fin-Fish Fishery

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Innes, James
dc.contributor.author Thebaud, Olivier
dc.contributor.author Norman-López, Ana
dc.contributor.author Little, Richard L.
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-30T19:31:12Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-30T19:31:12Z
dc.date.issued 2014 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10535/9687
dc.description.abstract "In fisheries managed using individual transferable quotas (ITQs) it is generally assumed that quota markets are well-functioning, allowing quota to flow on either a temporary or permanent basis to those able to make best use of it. However, despite an increasing number of fisheries being managed under ITQs, empirical assessments of the quota markets that have actually evolved in these fisheries remain scarce. The Queensland Coral Reef Fin-Fish Fishery (CRFFF) on the Great Barrier Reef has been managed under a system of ITQs since 2004. Data on individual quota holdings and trades for the period 2004-2012 were used to assess the CRFFF quota market and its evolution through time. Network analysis was applied to assess market structure and the nature of lease-trading relationships. An assessment of market participants’ abilities to balance their quota accounts, i.e., gap analysis, provided insights into market functionality and how this may have changed in the period observed. Trends in ownership and trade were determined, and market participants were identified as belonging to one out of a set of seven generalized types. The emergence of groups such as investors and lease-dependent fishers is clear. In 2011-2012, 41% of coral trout quota was owned by participants that did not fish it, and 64% of total coral trout landings were made by fishers that owned only 10% of the quota. Quota brokers emerged whose influence on the market varied with the bioeconomic conditions of the fishery. Throughout the study period some quota was found to remain inactive, implying potential market inefficiencies. Contribution to this inactivity appeared asymmetrical, with most residing in the hands of smaller quota holders. The importance of transaction costs in the operation of the quota market and the inequalities that may result are discussed in light of these findings." en_US
dc.language English en_US
dc.subject Great Barrier Reef en_US
dc.subject transaction costs en_US
dc.subject networks en_US
dc.title Does Size Matter? An Assessment of Quota Market Evolution and Performance ni the Great Barrier Reef Fin-Fish Fishery en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.type.published published en_US
dc.type.methodology Theory en_US
dc.coverage.region Pacific and Australia en_US
dc.coverage.country Australia en_US
dc.subject.sector Fisheries en_US
dc.identifier.citationjournal Ecology and Society en_US
dc.identifier.citationvolume 19 en_US
dc.identifier.citationnumber 3 en_US
dc.identifier.citationmonth September en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ES-2014-6637.pdf 1.137Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following document type(s)

Show simple item record